Asteroid 1994 CC comes
within 1.56 million miles (2.52 million km) of Earth (about six times
farther away than the Moon). The asteroid is composed of three separate
rocks, known as a "triple system" - it is one of just two triple system
asteroids known to be in a near-Earth orbit. Of all asteroids known to
be "near-Earth" 15 percent are composed of two separate rocks. Just one
percent are a triple system set up. The largest rock in the Asteroid
1994 CC system is about 2,300 feet (700 meters) wide. Two smaller rocks
are revolving around the central object.
.
.
Asteroid
Smashing Saturn's Rings
June 11, 2009:
On August 9, 2009 an
article titled "Like the Fist of an Angry God" at Discovermagazine.com
reported, "The latest pictures [taken June 11, 2009]
returned from the Cassini spacecraft (a probe the size of a school bus
that has been orbiting the ringed planet since 2004)…is something
new...[an] object on an inclined orbit has punched through Saturn's
narrow F ring, bursting out from underneath, and dragging behind it a
wake of particles from the rings. The upward-angled structure is
definitely real, as witnessed by the shadow it's casting on the ring
material to the lower left. And what's with the bright patch right
where this object seems to have slammed in the rings? Did it shatter
millions of icy particles, revealing their shinier interior material,
making them brighter? Clearly, something awesome and amazing happened
here. We are fated, I think, to watch Nature unfold before us and try
to figure it out after the fact."
Comments Posted for this Discovermagazine.com
article:
"It could be impact, not as a 'wake',
but as scattering [caused] by the impacting body. A passing meteor hit
a ring particle hard enough to break it up. Much of the impact debris
should have orbital velocities that are in the direction, or motion, of
the impacting body." - Marshall Eubanks
"A comet or other body would be
dragging along a wisp of gaseous material, possibly from melting
ice/out-gassing, or kept close by a tiny gravitational field."
- Tzarius
"If a rocky comet hit a large, icy ring
particle, shattering it and melting it, the water might come off
'slowly', like water falling off a whale as it breaches. There's little
gravity to bring the water back to the rings, but there is inertia that
might make it slip off the comet. The icy plume may be what we see."
- Bob C.
"Of what we're told, sure seems to be a lot of
activity up there. Jupiter impact last month [July 19]. Venus last
month [July 15]. Now these stories about Saturn's rings. Either our
solar system is passing through a lot of space junk, or a lot of space
junk is being pulled through our solar system." - UB313
"The mounting evidence of impacts and
collisions around our solar system is a harbinger of doom for our
world. We are just beginning to observe the vanguard of an
inter-galactic sized meteor storm which was sent outward from the
Andromeda Galaxy...[since] our galaxies are on a collision course. "
- NeeAnderTall
.
July
19, 2009 - Asteroid Hits Jupiter
Exactly
15 years after last big impact there
and on 40th anniversary of Apollo Moon Landing
ABC News - July
20, 2009
FOX News with
Bill Gates Hurricanes 1:40
KCAL9 TV NEWS 0:19
CNN w/discoverer Anthony Wesley
Jupiter Impact,
Solar Eclipse, 40th Anniversary of Apollo Moon Landing
All In One Day!
In the BBC video above,
when Dr. Kaku describes Jupiter as the solar sytem's "vacuum cleaner"
(at 1:29) and saves Earth from repeated asteroid impacts, that
information is outdated and incorrect. Below is a link to current
research which proves the opposite is true!
This 2009 impact
substantially raises the probability odds for a hit on Earth, odds
compounded by the 15th anniversary coincidence of a comet impacting
Jupiter on the same day in 1994. On dozens of media website "Comments"
sections we see a wave of irrational optimists insisting that the
impact ring on Jupiter is caused by a volcanic eruption from within the
planet, even though Jupiter is composed of gas.
JUPITER DOESN'T PROTECT US FROM
SPACE ROCKS - IT FLINGS THEM AT US!
- Scientific Study Proves
It
The same way that the Hendrix
asteroid prediction has been blacklisted by mogul controlled
mass media, and the same way this website has been surrounded by Microsoft
supercomputers to prevent 90-something percent of people
online from gaining access to this webpage, we now see how dominator
mass media promotes the giant gas planet Jupiter as our "friendly big
brother protector" - the "vacuum cleaner" asteroid sweeper benevolent
jovial cartoon Santa Claus of the Solar System.
"…where
never is heard a discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all
day…"
(Saint Ronald McReagan on Horseback sings Home On the Range)
For every one of these few reports shown below,
Mogul Control has flooded the internet with hundreds of articles that
portray Jupiter as our Friendly Vacuum Cleaner in the Sky...
"The planet Jupiter is thought to act as a 'cosmic
vacuum cleaner,' sucking up comets and asteroids that could potentially
hit the Earth and endanger all life on our planet…Jupiter is known as
defender of the inner solar system. This notion comes from the idea
that Jupiter is so massive that its gravitational influence deflects
objects like comets, which, as they spiral toward the Sun, could
potentially hit inner planets such as the Earth. Without Jupiter acting
as a 'cosmic vacuum cleaner' sucking up these dangerous objects, there
would be so many catastrophic impacts that life wouldn't have evolved
on the Earth and we wouldn't be here today. At least, this is the
commonly accepted wisdom."
- Astrobio.net,
November 12, 2007
"Jupiter, our solar system's 'big bully,' takes a
punch…MIT professor of planetary science Richard Binzel says the impact
highlights the role that Jupiter, with its powerful
gravitational field, plays in protecting the Earth and other
planets from such impacts. 'Jupiter is the big bully of the solar
system,' says Binzel, 'Under Jupiter's influence, many objects end up
being cast into the sun, some get cast out [of the solar system], and
some end up striking Jupiter itself. The net result is that Jupiter
keeps the inner solar system more cleaned out than it might
otherwise be...[but] we had no idea these kinds of impacts [in 1994 and
2009] might be so frequent'…he says. 'Amateur astronomers can now be
equipped with very capable digital cameras...a comparable capability to
what only professional astronomers had a decade ago. Thus the
capability of amateur astronomers means that any new event like this is
almost certain to be picked up.'"
- Physorg.com,
July 30, 2009
This is a real problem for Mogul Media. Earlier in
2009 the Pentagon ordered all news
of rocks aimed at Earth be classified Top Secret and not
reported. If the 2009 Jupiter impact had not been spotted by an amateur
astronomer, government officials would've concealed the news. After the
amateur reported it online Mogul Media was forced into spin mode and
all news outlets were flooded with a chorus of "Thanks be to Jupiter"
for protecting our little Earth.
But the Top-80
media outlets (they're ALL THE SAME PERSON) suppressed
and concealed research that shows Jupiter INCREASES the risk
of rock impacts on Earth
In an August 24, 2007 Newscientist.com
article, "Jupiter Increases Risk of Comet Strike On Earth," David Shiga
reported, "Contrary to prevailing wisdom, Jupiter does not
protect Earth from comet strikes. In fact, Earth would suffer fewer
impacts without the influence of Jupiter's gravity, a new
study says…A new study by Jonathan Horner and Barrie Jones of Open
University in Milton Keynes, UK, shows that if there were no planet at
all in Jupiter's orbit, Earth would actually be safer from impacts…[Jupiter's]
gravity helps pull comets into the inner solar system, where they have
a chance of hitting Earth…Alessandro Morbidelli of Nice
Observatory in France, who studies solar system dynamics, says…about
95% of the impacts on Earth are due to asteroids. He suspects that a
smaller planet in place of Jupiter may lead to fewer asteroid
impacts…'A decrease in the overall bombardment rate of the Earth,' he
told New Scientist. The results were presented
Friday at the European Planetary Science Congress 2007 in Potsdam,
Germany."
- Newscientist.com,
August 24, 2007
"Part of what makes the Earth such a nice place to
live, the story goes, is that Jupiter's overbearing gravity acts as a
gravitational shield deflecting incoming space junk away from the inner
solar system…That's Jupiter doing its cosmic job, astronomers like to
say. Better it than us. But is this warm and fuzzy image of the King of
Planets as father-protector really true? 'I really question
this idea,' said Brian Marsden of the Harvard-Smithsonian
Center for Astrophysics, referring to Jupiter as our guardian planet.
As the former director of the International Astronomical Union's
Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams [CBAT], he has spent his
career keeping track of wayward objects, particularly comets, in the
solar system. Jupiter is just as much a menace as a
savior, he said. The big planet throws a lot of comets out of the solar
system, but it also throws them in. Take, for
example, Comet Lexell…it whizzed only a million miles from the Earth,
missing us by a cosmic whisker, Dr. Marsden said. That comet had come
streaking in from the outer solar system three years earlier and passed
close to Jupiter, which diverted it into a new orbit and straight
toward Earth. 'It was as if Jupiter aimed at us and missed,'
said Dr. Marsden, who complained that the comet would never
have come anywhere near the Earth if Jupiter hadn't thrown it at us in
the first place. Hal Levison, an astronomer at the Southwest
Research Institute, in Boulder, Colo., who studies the evolution of the
solar system, said…Jupiter probably does increase our exposure
to those comets. Asteroids pose the greatest danger of all to
Earth, however, astronomers say, and here Jupiter's influence is hardly
assuring. Mostly asteroids live peacefully in the asteroid belt between
Mars and Jupiter, whose gravity…can cause them to collide and
rebound in the direction of Earth."
- New York Times,
July 25, 2009
July 15, 2009:
VENUS IMPACT COVER UP
"If [the ESA's] Venus Express [spacecraft probe]
is watching Venus so closely, why did it have to take an amateur
astronomer, and four days, for the spot to be found?"
-
Newscientist.com July 29, 2009
White
Hole Punched Through Thick Atmosphere
The European Space Agency's planetary probe named Venus
Express is currently the only spacecraft in orbit around the
planet Venus. On July 15, 2009 the Venus Express
recorded a massive impact into that planet's surface. Invoking the
recently enacted Total
Blackout of news about space impacts, ordered by the
Pentagon, media worldwide issued no reports of the explosion on Venus,
the event wasn't mentioned in media anywhere. The Pentagon's "Top
Secret" decree to conceal asteroid news is followed by all governments
that fund space exploration.
But four days later, on July 19, 2009, the huge
collision ring on the surface of Venus was seen by an amateur
astronomer within hours of another amateur astronomer finding a similar
impact collision spot on
the planet Jupiter. Amidst these cosmic wonders, what stood
out in full view of us all was the spectacle of NASA's gang of global
astronomers trying to hide the Venus impact for four days straight. As
with the asteroid near
miss in March 2009, if an amateur star gazer hadn't stumbled
on the threat, media/government would've kept the news secret. The
implication is that there are dozens/hundreds of similar threats
detected in space by government monitors and it's all being discretely
deleted from public records. At stake is our awareness of the
escalation in favor of odds for a rock hitting Earth soon, that's what
these July 2009 impacts represent; finally knowing
that planetary impacts are common in our solar
system, Earth is overdue for a similar hit, and at ALL COSTS this
perception must be suppressed in public opinion by the moguls who
control most of global media. They're racing to build escape havens for
themselves and MUST condition the public to shrug off and deny the
chance of impact on Earth.
Immediately after the amateur astronomers spread
news of the Venus/Jupiter impacts, mogul media mercenaries - minion
publishers, producers and editors - rush into Emergency Spin Mode and
portray the explosions on Venus and Jupiter as being caused by
"volcanic eruptions". It's the same ploy used to downplay past asteroid
impact extinctions on Earth, mogul controlled media deems it essential
to CONvince consumers to believe gigantic
volcanoes, not asteroids, are to blame for extinctions.
Ninety-something percent of the public has been brain-trained to
associate asteroid impact with negligible likelihood. To point out that
the opposite is true is to pull the mask off the fact that the top-100
media outlets are figuratively "all the same person" who's spared no
expense to train us all to spew ridiculed derision at anyone who
suggests that the entire media network of the planet has been hijacked,
appropriated, owned and controlled by a tiny cabal of unjust moneyed
global mogul elitists who're frantically channeling ripped off world
resources into their personal mad dash to preserve themselves at our
expense.
"They're
trying to build their own heavens." - Jimi
"History
is what appears in the New York Times archive, the place where people
will go to find out what happens is the New York Times, therefore it's
extremely important, if history is going to be shaped
in an appropriate way, that certain things appear and certain things not
appear, and certain questions be asked and other questions be ignored,
and that issues be framed in a particular fashion.
In whose interests is the history being so shaped? That's not very
difficult to answer." - Noam Chomsky
Recorded for all to see in media reports from July
2009 are bizarre descriptions, from Space.com and other controlled
media outlets, that report the Venus/Jupiter impact craters as
"blemishes" and make NO MENTION at all of even the POSSIBILITY that
asteroid/comet collisions produced what are obviously impact explosions
on those planets.
"The
European Space Agency's (ESA) Venus Express spacecraft confirmed the
presence of the blemish."
-
Space.com, July 30, 2009
"An
eruption would have to be quite energetic to get a cloud this high.
Furthermore, at a latitude of 50 degrees south, the spot lies outside
the region of known volcanoes on Venus."
- astronomynow.com, July
21, 2009
Venus specialist Dr. Sanjay Limaye of the
University of Wisconsin corrected Space.com, "The volcano explanation
is unlikely, for several reasons: volcanoes on Venus seem to be less
likely to blow their tops in Mount St. Helens-type fashion, instead
behaving more like the oozing lava factories of Hawaii, so their
eruptions wouldn't likely
produce huge clouds of ash and steam. Also, it is unlikely
that the explosions would have the power to push through to the other
layers of Venus' extremely dense atmosphere."
- Space.com, July 30, 2009
Without even mentioning asteroid or comet cause
for the crater, Space.com proceeds to try and train us to regard it as
resulting from "a coronal mass ejection" or "the solar wind" or even
"some internal change in Venus' atmosphere".
The prime directive of mogul controlled global
media is to pacify/divert concern and DENY the threat that these events
represent to us on Earth. Yet, in the nether regions of the "Comments"
sections on various websites First Century Press excavates messages
from a few lone souls who dared to raise the common sense view that
mass media is hysterically concealing:
Nothing to see here folks,
please move along..." - Editor
From Newscientist.com - July 29, 2009 -
Comments section:
"A possibility I'm sure has passed through everyone's mind, but needs
be said anyway: meteor or asteroid impact…a
high angle iron meteor can create a volcanic eruption." - Charles Kafka
"Professionals missed [spotting impactors in
advance] twice :( And they
hope save Earth from the NEO asteroids?" - Niktos
From Space.com - July 30, 2009 - Comments
section:
"If there was a shower of debris coming from beneath the solar plane
(the solar 'south'), it would explain why we didn't see it coming (no
one looks outside of the solar plane, usually), and would also explain
why it's the southern hemispheres of Venus and Jupiter that show these
[crater] anomalies." - Maeklos
"The southern hemisphere facing the sun [is] a
blind spot for all planets. A comet or meteor hitting Venus and Jupiter
is not coincidence at all…an asteroid or comet coming from the inner
solar system, and in the direction of southern hemispheres of most
planets, would go undetected until it was too late." - Hasonj
"A volcanic plume seems unlikely given Venus'
thick dense atmosphere. An impact seems the most likely…A satellite
with radar mapping capacities would be able to verify." -
Astronutwannabe
"When someone finally comes up with an
'acceptable' response [to explain the spots on two planets], that
doesn't necessarily mean that's the truth." - IxSonicxI
.
August 12, 2009:
At the height of the
annual summer Persied meteor showers, just days after pictures were
released of Saturn's rings
being smashed by asteroids, and weeks after impacts on Jupiter and
Venus,
NASA issues a press release announcing its inability to search for
Earth threatening rocks with the agency's current budget. The Associated
Press reported the story, which was picked up by media
worldwide:
ABC News reports, "NASA CAN'T
KEEP UP WITH KILLER ASTEROIDS: Study finds that NASA can't meet its
goal of spotting nearly all Earth-threatening asteroids. NASA is
charged with spotting most of the asteroids that pose a threat to Earth
but doesn't have the money to complete the job, a federal report says.
That's because even though Congress assigned the space agency that
mission four years ago, it never gave NASA the money to build the
necessary telescopes, according to the report released Wednesday by the
National Academy of Sciences. Specifically, the mission calls for NASA,
by the year 2020, to locate 90 percent of the potentially deadly rocks
hurtling through space. The agency says it's been able to complete
about one-third of its assignment with the current telescope system.
NASA estimates that there are about 20,000 asteroids and comets in our
solar system that are potential threats…That number changes as new
asteroids are added and old ones are removed as information is gathered
on their orbits. Just last month astronomers were surprised when an
object of unknown size and origin bashed into Jupiter and created an
Earth-sized bruise that is still spreading…when it comes to monitoring,
the academy concluded 'there has been relatively little effort by the
U.S. government.' And the United States is practically the only
government doing anything at all, the report found. NASA calculated
that to spot the asteroids as required by law would mean spending about
$800 million between now and 2020. It may never get the money, said
John Logsdon, a space policy professor at George Washington University.
'The program is a little bit of a lame duck,' Logsdon said. There is
not a big enough group pushing for the money."
.
August
13, 2009:
The
Washington Post/Miami Herald Spin
The day after NASA announces it can't keep up
with killer asteroids, and with the last of the Persied
meteors showering the skies, the Washington Post Service
reports, "NASA's Moon Plan Too Ambitious, Obama Panel Says - A panel
reviewing NASA's current plans for human space flight will report that
there is no realistic way to return to the moon by 2020 - or even 2028.
NASA doesn't have nearly enough money to meet its goal of putting
astronauts back on the moon by 2020, and it might be the wrong place to
go, anyway. That's one of the harsh messages emerging from a sweeping
review of NASA's human space flight program…Landing on the moon by 2020
would require such drastic budgetary maneuvers as de-orbiting the
International Space Station - crashing it into the South Pacific in
2016…the gap between NASA's goals and its current budget totals roughly
$50 billion by 2020. If the space station's life is extended for five
years the current budget would allow for the completion of a
heavy-boost moon rocket only in 2028, and that would be without
spending money on developing the components of a lunar base…Of options
being explored…the committee is most animated by what it calls
the 'Deep Space' option…the 'Deep Space' strategy would send them to near-Earth asteroids…The
panel is certain to recommend extending the life of the International
Space Station. It is also pushing hard for greater commercialization
of space, including using private companies to taxi
astronauts to Low Earth Orbit."
MOGUL MOTEL - NO
VACANCIES
[NOTE: LET THE SPIN BEGIN - it's called
"Seeding the Media" - global moguls order their paid puppet sycophant
talking heads to "mold public opinion" in support of maintaining a
privately owned Space Station escape haven of floating condos for
unjust moneyed billionaires. Astronauts are just so much hi-tech hotel
staff…]
August
19, 2009:
Agence France-Presse (AFP)
reports, "Tight Budget Quashes US Space Ambitions…US ambitions for
manned space exploration have hit a major hurdle in the wake of severe
budget constraints, according to preliminary findings of a panel
appointed by President Obama…Returning to the Moon by 2020 was ruled
out barring an additional three billion dollars per year to replace the
retiring space shuttle fleet and build bigger rockets…'We've really
given the White House a dilemma. The human space flight program we have
today really isn't executable with the money we have,' [said committee
chairman] Norman Augustine…The outlook is bleak, with maintenance
of the almost-completed International Space Station (ISS) through 2020
the only remaining viable project. Also in the works is a
plan to use commercial rockets to ensure transportation to and from the
ISS…The White House could take months to decide its course of
action, said John Logsdon, former director of the Space Policy
Institute at George Washington University. 'We have lived an illusion
for five years,' he told AFP, urging a new
direction. The US space shuttle program and the ISS, he said, 'were a
mistake.'"
[NOTE: The "illusion" is believing
asteroid disaster is unlikely, happening infrequently. The reality is
impact of Earth happens often. The "mistake" is
that, unless humans can live independently on the Moon, we go extinct
from space rocks. What we see today through the internet is how the
majority of people are trained to accept
extinction. That we could have protected the planet
from impact, and that there are people who've caused
human vulnerability to space rocks, that insight is artificially
absent from the spectrum of opinions we see online - it's like a
massive public relations campaign was waged to erase awareness that
certain people are responsible for our lack of
asteroid defense. They're the same people who control mass media - and
they've used MSM to disseminate deception. But what they're left with
is a desperate attempt to escape into space, and dig their underground bunkers
funded with plundered public money.]
August
20, 2009:
Space.com continues the spin:
"NASA Opportunities Abound for Commercial Space Efforts…Government and
industry officials point to other promising developments. When White
House Science Adviser John Holdren called in May for a thorough review
of the agency's human spaceflight plans and programs, he cited
'stimulating commercial spaceflight capability' as one of the review
board's primary goals. Earlier this month, the committee reviewing
NASA's spaceflight plans suggested the agency set aside $2.5
billion through 2014 to support efforts by commercial firms to develop
new space vehicles for crew transportation to the International Space
Station…'I think you will see a lot more
partnerships with industry and international agencies,' John
Olson, NASA deputy for commercial space support, said."
STRATEGICALLY PLACED
COMMENTS AT SPACE.COM SETS THE STAGE FOR A MOGUL SCHEME:
"Another step would be to modify the
current ISS so that private industry firms like Bigelow Aerospace can
attach modal's and share infrastructure. If current funding will not
allow NASA to go to the moon it may as well go toward planting the seed
for the first off-world city. Then perhaps you and I will one day have
the chance to go into space, rather than just government and the super
rich." - mikecrane
"Let private industry take over ISS…[the
plan] should be allowed to go further where we lease the ISS space to
scientists. Now it's a profit center…The problem has always been the
heavy federal restrictions placed on the private industry, making it
virtually impossible for them to get into space on their own. The
government has maintained a nice monopoly on space travel…However, in
recent years, these restrictions have been lifted, or are currently
being looked at for overhaul so that private businesses CAN get into
space more readily. Privatize the ISS." - MasterSith
August
21, 2009:
NBC Nightly News acts as tool
to fool consumers - what else is "new"?
NBC News: "Will American
astronauts return to the Moon in the foreseeable future? Travel there
and beyond may in fact be scrubbed and that would put tens of thousands
of jobs in jeopardy…NASA's focus has been on space shuttles and the
space station, close to Earth. But the Columbia disaster in 2003
changed all that. A year after Columbia, President Bush ordered that
the space shuttles be grounded in 2010 and NASA focus on a new
generation of rockets and space crafts to carry astronauts back to the
Moon…"
[NOTE: Not true. The Columbia explosion
was used as an EXCUSE to announce a covert scheme to FLEE THE PLANET
BEFORE THE ROCK HITS. Global moguls have today appropriated NASA to
create and maintain private penthouse modules on the space station and
luxury lunar condos on the Moon. Their for-hire "scientists" are mere
enablers assigned the task of paving the way for billionaire-only safe
havens from impact disaster. The video below shows what really
motivates this mad dash back to the Moon...]
NBC continues: "…the first
lunar mission set for 2020. But now all of that is in jeopardy and it's
all about dollars and cents…Getting there by 2020 will cost at least
another 3 to 5 billion dollars each year, but killing the Moon mission
would mean losing highly skilled jobs…Right now NASA has 58,000 people
employed through contractors and civil service. The dropping of this
program will reduce that by half. Anxious to save jobs, lawmakers are
pushing to extend the shuttle's life and save the new Ares rocket
program…Without a Moon mission, where does NASA go? The man who ran
NASA under Bush says giving up on the Moon would be a mistake. [Mike
Griffin,] 'It's about what you value, and if America is going to
continue to be a forward looking exploring pioneer nation, or not?'"
[NOTE: What it's really "about" is
CONNING sheeple into funding a MOGULS-ONLY NOAH'S ARK. What their
rigged/scripted media needs to conceal most is this: the human herd has
no way of defending itself against impacts from space. The REASON we're
at this sorry state of being
unprepared is because for thousands of years a small class of
unjust moneyed men have paid their mercenary armies to hoard resources
for themselves. Ninety percent of the population, those who could have
and would have organized to alert us to the danger from space and
persuade us to invest in methods to deflect rocks - they were all
persecuted and impoverished by this EVIL ELITE of unjust moneyed
dominators who've killed us all. Hendrix and Rock Prophecy
are the ultimate examples - today's civilization will be extinct
because of what dominators did to Jimi and his vision. And their "last
stand" is to use Mogul Media to convince everyone that asteroid
disasters just happen - that's life - no one is to blame. It's a lie.
The inequalities, the wasted time and fighting, those attitudes set
back the innovations of technology for centuries. Those who tried to
point it out became society's parriahs, brutalized outcasts. The resul
is everyone here now gets wiped out by ROCK for the majority's choice
to persecute Jimi and Rock Prophecy. So forget
useless schemes to escape - as Jimi said "No one here will
escape" - the more they persecute Rock Prophecy
the more severe impending "removal" becomes…]
Jan.
6 2010:ASTEROID COLLISIONS PIC
View of Increasingly Cluttered Debris Field In Space
Surrounded
& Enshrouded In Clouds of
Obstacle Rocks Knocked Our Way
.
June
3, 2010:Impact On Jupiter - AGAIN!
If It Weren't for AMATEUR Astonomers, We'd NEVER KNOW
MSM Websites Rush
To Lie:
"Our Friendly Jovian Neighbor PROTECTING Earth from Hits"
June
3, 2010:
MSNBC reports, "Yet another
cosmic impact left a mark on the giant planet today. And this time, it
was caught on video...amateur observers of Jupiter saw the flash of
impact at 20:31 GMT today (4:31 p.m. ET)...a short video that was
posted on [line]." - cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com
"How cute that Jupiter just happens to
be around to protect the Earth from meteorites and comets!" -
Sam John, msnbc.com, June 3, 2010
"It is cute...just like a big brother
should!" - Daystar 7, msnbc.com, June 3, 2010
"It is still a very active solar
system. We should all be thankful for Jupiter." - John
Pollard, msnbc.com, June 4, 2010
"Jupiter probably had a volcanic
eruption that would be considered catastrophic on earth to be seen this
far away. Just another 'burp' for our distant cuz." - D.A.
Colt, msnbc.com, June 4, 2010
"How can a gas giant without a solid
surface have seismic activity or volcanic eruptions?" -
Whut?, msnbc.com, June 4, 2010
[NOTE: "Volcanic eruption" is the
Denial-of-Choice for those who demand/insist that we have no asteroids
to fear, they claim past extinctions on Earth were caused by long-dormant volcanoes.]
"A scientific study reported in Aug. 2007
demonstrated that Jupiter does NOT protect Earth from impacts, rather,
the opposite is true, Jupiter it draws rocks INTO the solar system and
flings them TOWARDS us. What's curious is how, by a thousand to one
margin, consumers have been trained to view impacts on Jupiter as a
Jovial friendly reminder of Big Bro pretecting us. As soon as these
planet impacts are reported we see dozens/hundreds of posts comments
repeating this view of wishful thinking error about Jupiter
'protecting' us. These ill-informed posts speak much to the need for
denial over the rocks that will surely impact here (so much sooner than
consumers will ever admit or believe) - that's what today's news really
means - our chance of impact is CERTAIN." - My Post,
msnbc.com, June 4, 2010
On March 2, 2009 an asteroid came within
38 thousand miles of hitting Earth. Orbiting satellites are 20 thousand
miles high.
NBC Nightly News - March 3, 2009
March 3,
2009 CNN Report On Asteroid 2009 DD45
March 18, 2009:
Two weeks after Asteroid 2009 DD45 nearly
hit Earth, another space rock, 15 meters (49 ft.) wide, Asteroid 2009
FH comes within 79,000 kilometers (49,000 miles) of Earth on March 18,
2009. Another extremely close pass. Unlike the NEO
pass two weeks ago, this time there is very little MSM reports about
it, as if an artificial limit on "scary" news is being imposed by H.I.M.M.