September 23, 2009:

Just six days prior to publication of the Sept. 23rd NewScientist.com article quoted below, titled "Asteroid Attack," humanity came within 645,000 miles of extinction from a giant asteroid, and media worldwide closed ranks to hide the event. Some of the naive posts listed in the comments section to this article shown below are typical of a totally trained populace whose opinions have been carefully crafted by the elite class that controls media. One of the most bizarre and surreal experiences in life is to point out the facts about the Sept. 16, 2009 near extinction of civilization, describe how information about it is absent from media, and watch almost everyone you tell this to stare at you blankly, unable to comprehend what you've said. Many just rush to condemn you for delusions of "conspiracy theory." This incident alone can serve as verifiable evidence that J. Edgar Hoover was astutely correct when he said "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy to monstrous he can't believe it exists." Without doubt the average simple-minded "folk" must cling desperately to fantasies of a "superman NASA" that can save us from asteroids, but they don't really have to because chance of impact is so low." That the opposite is true cannot be conveyed to these people - their ability to remain functional is dependent on fantasy thinking that's unaffected by whatever evidence is presented.

"There’s nothing we can explain to them. Most of it is from bitterness. If you start thinking negative, it switches to bitterness, aggression, hatred, whatever." - Jimi Hendrix

Sept. 23, 2009: The NewScientist.com report titled, "Asteroid Attack: Putting Earth's Defenses to the Test"…The U.S. Air Force recently brought together scientists, military officers and emergency-response officials for the first time to assess the nation's ability to cope, should [asteroid threat] come to pass. They were asked to imagine how their respective organizations would respond…after just three days' warning…The exercise, which took place in December 2008, exposed the chilling dangers asteroids pose. Not only is there no plan for what to do when an asteroid hits, but our early-warning systems are woefully inadequate. "As a taxpayer, I would appreciate my Air Force taking a look at something that would be certainly as bad as nuclear terrorism in a city, and potentially a civilization-ending event," said organiser Peter Garreston.

The latest space rock to put the frighteners on us was…first spotted it just 20 hours before impact - at a distance of 500,000 kilometers - and astronomers say we were lucky to get any warning at all…We are nearly as blind to objects big enough to do serious harm. We have barely begun to track down the millions of skyscraper-sized asteroids zipping around Earth's neighborhood, any one of which could unleash as much destructive power as a nuclear bomb on impact…Asteroid impacts are not as rare as you might think…The chance of a [1908 Tunguska-size] impact is about 1 in 500 each year. Put another way, that's a 10 per cent chance of an impact in the next 50 years. "Fifty-meter asteroids scare me to death," says Timothy Spahr, director of the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "I could easily see a 50-metre object hitting in three days causing absolute pandemonium. I'm picturing people panicking and driving the wrong way on the freeway, screaming 'Oh my god, it's going to kill us!'"

During the U.S. Air Force planning exercise, the participating scientists explained that with so little warning there would be no hope of preventing an impact…A 50-meter asteroid would weigh hundreds of thousands of tons, requiring an enormous push to change its trajectory appreciably - so much so that detonating a nuke near it in space would not provide a sufficient impulse so late in the game to cause a miss. To deflect an asteroid sufficiently, force would need to be applied years in advance. Realistically, though, the nuclear option would not be on the table in the first place: the nuclear-tipped missiles sitting patiently in silos around the world are not designed to track and home in on an asteroid or even survive for more than a few minutes in space. Instead, we would simply have to brace ourselves for the impact.

To prevent panic and disorganized movement, it is crucial for authorities to develop an evacuation plan and communicate it to the public as soon as possible…[an asteroid] hitting the ocean would cause a giant splash that could smash coastal buildings with high-speed volleys of water. The tremendous damage…led NASA scientists in 2003 to rate ocean impacts by asteroids as far more dangerous than those on or over land.

An asteroid flying out of nowhere and exploding over a sensitive region like the Middle East could be misinterpreted as a nuclear attack…The 2008 U.S. Air Force exercise could barely scratch the surface of the incoming-asteroid problem. It discovered that there is no plan for how to coordinate the activities of NASA, emergency planners, the US military and other parts of government. Further planning exercises are needed…Our chance of having any prior warning at all for an approaching 30-meter asteroid is no better than 25 to 35 per cent with existing sky surveillance…The Sun washes out half of the sky with daylight, blinding us to 50 per cent of threatening objects. Even glare from the Moon can hide unwelcome incoming guests. What's more, two of the world's three leading asteroid surveys are based in Arizona…The region tends to cloud over between July and September.

NASA-funded surveys are limited to watching the skies of the northern hemisphere…Plans are afoot to construct the 8.4-meter Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [LSST] in Chile by 2015, though the project is still raising funds…[but] every ground-based lookout suffers from interference from the Sun and Moon. A dedicated space telescope would fix this problem, but such a mission could cost more than a billion dollars.

While asteroid impacts are much rarer than hurricanes and earthquakes, they have the potential to do much greater damage. "It does warrant some priority in the list of things that we ought to be worried about," warns Johnson, "from what we know today it could be next week." The fastest way to deflect an asteroid away from Earth would be to send a nuclear bomb aboard a spacecraft, though we'd still need several years' warning. The spacecraft would have to be able to home in on the asteroid and to trigger the explosion at just the right distance. Precision is needed to avoid breaking up the hurtling rock while still giving it enough of a nudge to prevent the Earth impact years down the line. That assumes we're already prepared. Designing and building new spacecraft typically takes a few years. With current rocket technology, it would probably take several additional years to reach a threatening asteroid. And since the explosion would need to occur years ahead of the predicted impact in order to make the asteroid miss Earth, we'd need decades of lead time if we hoped to deflect Armageddon. A confounding factor is that nukes in space are forbidden by the Outer Space Treaty of 1967.

[NOTE: This notion that nuclear bombs are effective in space is misleading. Here's the reasons why they won't work.]

COMMENTS POSTED TO THE ABOVE ARTICLE AT NewScientist.com:

The idea that the solution to asteroid collisions is to "blast them to smithereens" comes from Hollywood movies. The reality is more complicated. Blasting an asteroid to smithereens is not as easy as one might think, and not necessarily productive. The effects of nuclear weapons in a [space] vacuum are significantly different to the effects in the atmosphere. Contrary to what one might see in Hollywood movies, asteroids would not disintegrate into harmless lights when a nuclear weapon detonates nearby…the major effect of the detonation will be surface ablation…by applying a few centimeters per second of velocity change [to the rock] early enough, you can make the object miss the Earth [but] this requires several years of lead time, and requires accurately tracking the orbits of far more objects than we do at present. But by the time an object is three days away, there's nothing you can do to prevent impact. - Pistachio T Wildebeest

Nuking an asteroid is not a good idea for several reasons. The first is that a nuke would not explode in space like it does in the atmosphere. A nuclear bomb is so destructive on Earth because of the effects it has on the local atmosphere: shockwaves are created due to heating and sudden large expansion of a small mass into a ball of plasma caused by fission/fusion. In space all you would have is heating from radiation, infrared gamma etc…and there would be no atmospheric shockwave. The mass of 2 tons of plasma spreading in all directions is going to have neglible effect on a 500,000 ton ball of spinning metal. This is why nukes are put inside asteroids in Hollywood films, with the idea of splitting them open. Detonating a nuke next to an asteroid will be of limited use…it would be relatively ineffective to detonate a nuke outside the body, unless done several years/billions of miles from the Earth, as the surface evaporation from an unfocused nuclear blast on a few tons of metal would have limited force to push the asteroid seriously off course. Putting a nuke inside an asteroid is also not a good idea. Apart from the technical challenge to actually drill a meter-plus wide hole of up to 50/100 meters depth into a large spinning mass of unknown density at unimaginable distances from Earth, you have 2 scenarios: 1) loose rubble is blown apart by a massive nuke, creating a shotgun effect, the danger of capturing this shrapnel in low Earth orbit, making it is impossible to [launch anything] into space due to space debris trapped around the Earth…each object destroyed, like space ships or satellites, is itself turned into more space debris. That situation would take hundreds of years to solve, all we can do is wait for the debris density to decrease naturally. 2) Throwing current nuclear weapon technology at asteroids and comets is bad science. A suitable nuclear device for this situation, to blow AWAY a dangerous solar body, would have to be able to seriously melt glaciers, with a thickness of a mile or more, from the outside [which means] the energy of an erupting volcano. Our largest nukes can't even scratch huge lumps of ice. - mogg

Nukes are sitting on top of ICBMs, which are suborbital delivery platforms. You might be able to organize for some of them to go off near an object as it entered the atmosphere, but if you think you can lob an MIRV at something that's as far away as the Moon or further with a Polaris or an Atlas, look up the velocity needed for a balistic shot, the velocity needed for orbital insertion, and the escape velocity. THEN let's talk about throwing nukes around. - Mike Thompson

The deflection methods we know about seem futile with objects in this size range, unless we have years of early warning. Nuking such objects would also be futile. Applying a steady thrust orthogonal to its path, e.g. with ion propulsion, would change the orbit, but would be difficult to control, especially at the distances needed to deflect the object enough to miss Earth. And any errors could even aid the object and move it into a potentially more deadly trajectory. We clearly have a lot more to learn about such objects, and the research needs to be increased, not cut back. - Paul

The NEO [near-Earth object] program is currently budgeted at $4.1 million per year for FY 2006 through FY 2012 Global military expenditures are over $1.460.000 million per year! We spend 4.1 to protect life on Earth and 1.460.000 to exterminate life on Earth! I call this STUPID. - Emo

[NOTE: In the 1999 Rock Prophecy book, it is called "Retarded History."]

We should have a world wide plan to handle such an emergency. It's not just our problem and expense, it's everyones's. But we have to first solve the problem of the Islamic countries tieing up our time, and resources, trying to kill us or convert us. We need an early warning system base located far out in space such as on Mars or the Moon, This would give us a better chance of survival as we would have more time to move a big rock or commet. - ronnie

Given enough time, years, a large solar reflector deployed to illuminate one side of the asteroid could deflect it off course away from the Earth. The vaporization and/or sublimation of the surface would provide impulse to alter the trajectory of the asteroid. It's clean. The nuke option is very messy, very uncertain. - Hobart

Governments seem so eager to play God in so many things. It is unforgivable that they do not have a coherent plan for these scenarios. - Scott Quint

Yes, but I suppose they've had this little "heads-up" training course thingy, so they're going to be trying to come up with an action plan should this scenario hold true. - Maddy

Given the fact that preventing an impact is currently impossible, large numbers of survivors from an evacuated city would place an intolerable burden onto the rest of any struggling nation trying to survive the devastating after-effects of an asteroid hit. Would the authorities even try to save anybody? The first most citizens would hear about an asteroid would be when a large light in the sky appears directly above their heads, a couple of minutes before impact. - Chris Kibbey

We need to detect and react to these threats months ahead of time. Species like our own are too busy wasting resources on war to give a damn about what can take us all out. - Mick C. Malkemus

"While our atmosphere is likely to protect us from asteroids smaller than 100 metres across…"

The Tunguska bolide was less than 100 metres across, and our atmosphere didn't protect the forests or animals in the vicinity. We already know pretty well what the probabilities are for any given size bolide hitting us next week, and the chances are quite small that anything noticeable will come our way! - Eric Kvaalen

At Least Worry About The Right Things. On the probability argument about another Tunguska event in the next fifty years, look at the Vela satellite data - nuclear weapon-sized [rock explosions in the atmosphere] events about once a year. About three to five Tunguska-class events took place in the last century, that we know of. - Robert I. Eachus

Although there is little risk of a big asteroid impact within the lifetime of anyone now living, the cost of an impact would be high. There is a low risk of an event that would cause the extinction of humanity, but we can regard the cost of such an event as approaching infinity. Considering both the low probability and the high cost, the risk may be worth considering. It makes more sense to spend big bucks on building an early warning system and a defense shield against asteroids than to spend trillions to prevent climate change. - Fred Colbourne

It would seem this "self-defense" requirement is one reason to accelerate human spaceflight programs. If asteroids could be detected early enough, missions could be sent out to attach small thruster/guidance units to the rocks which would change their orbits enough to either make them miss us or to steer the asteroid into the Sun. This is the sort of technology we will need to mine the asteroids anyway; why not buy a species insurance policy with the money? - James Brinton

Any object in the universe produces a small gravitational field, so by strategically placing a large satellite you could divert the asteroid's path onto any given directional path. - Nick Zak

Yes, we use Jupiter for that. - Bela

[NOTE: This notion of "Jupiter as Protector of Earth" is another commonly held misperception, as this scientific study shows, Jupiter actually flings rocks at us! The inability to comprehend Hendrix is ultimately the cause of human lack of preparation - Jimi's remote view isn't even a factor in any calculations opinion scenario, yet it's the key warning. Had he lived to produce his movie about it the course of history would have changed. Had the book Rock Prophecy not been censored and suppressed by Microsoft's Paul Allen, the issues would've been raised in "1995" - the last point at which we had a chance to avert the coming asteroid disaster. Dimissal of Jimi's warning and persecution of Rock Prophecy by these disgusting mean measly little sheeple leaves no sympathy for the pathetic creatures who're simply sitting ducks waiting for obliteration of this god-forsaken planet. They've brought this upon themselves, their civilization doesn't matter. Offical "risk assessments" for impact are ridiculously rigged and politicized to pacify consumers, as these sheeplized simpletons ahead demonstrate with their misinformed posts…]

There's a bit of scaremongering going on. The next time a bolide comes along and kills 10,000 people is probably thousands of years from now. We have many worse problems to deal with. - Eric Kvaalen

I am reluctant to take this very real problem seriously, simply because it is reminiscent of times in the past when we have been told to "panic." - Matt L

Beyond the entertainment value of "what ifs," this is one problem that is simply not worth worrying about at all. Doing so seriously would indicate a high level of obsessive paranoia, as would worrying about any danger that is so remote. Only an obession about being attacked by sharks in the Tower of London could be worse. - Jonathan Seer

- NewScientist.com - Sept. 23, 2009

[NOTE: Yeah, right, dream on you goofy delusional dominator, you'll soon be a pile of dust orbiting an insignificant little star spinning at the lonely outer reaches of the Milky Way.]

October 8, 2009:

On the anniversary of 1200 Americans being killed by space rocks, one of the most powerful meteor explosions ever observed occurred over Indonesia and media worldwide kept the incident hidden. But a local resident caught the sight on a cell phone cam and posted video online. Three weeks after the explosion, Space.com responded to the video:

"Wall Of Secrecy - 'Almost certainly it was detected and immediately identified as an explosion of a large meteoroid rather than, say, an explosion of a human-made device in the atmosphere,' said Clark Chapman, a noted specialist on asteroids. 'But these satellites are [classified] secret and, in the past, the establishments controlling them have delayed releasing the data, for weeks or months.' Earlier this year, Chapman added, a change in previous policy led the U.S. military to withhold the data from the public. 'Scientists hope that [the Pentagon] will reverse that policy. This event will demonstrate...the wall of secrecy because of the passage of weeks since the [Oct. 8th] event and there has been no decision to release the data promptly." - Space.com - Oct. 29, 2009

October 16, 2009:

The asteroid story can't be taken any further by media. A similar thing happened with the Hendrix story. Several dozen "Hendrix books" have been published and in a sense they're all "the same book" because they follow a narrow menu range of concepts about Hendrix, ideas that the media elite approve of and permit/finance. Statements about Hendrix that don't fit into this narrow litmus test list of concepts are weeded out, left unpublished.

We are in a period where the same thing has happened to the "asteroid story." The media elite have defined the "dozen high concepts" that published reports about asteroids follow. Ideas like those expressed in Rock Prophecy are excluded. But the blitz of asteroid stories and reports listed in the Timeline above, and triggered by Rock Prophecy, now set the stage for a text of revolutionary context surrounding the asteroid issue. Rock Prophecy is a philosophical horror story - what the anti-equality unfree elitist media is most concerned to obstruct and crush.

When the book Rock Prophecy is read from beginning to end, come back to the listings above and gauge for yourself whether or not my manuscript influenced wealthy string-pullers who set an agenda for asteroid issues in mass media. Was my manuscript studied at the LOC by paid consultants for someone? In response to the contents of Rock Prophecy strategies were devised to use media to influence the public's attitude towards asteroids. The reports listed above all appeared after my research was sent to the Library of Congress.

Co-opting the asteroid story and overexposing it in mass media has the effect of distancing the issue away from Hendrix. Left out of all media reports about asteroids are the implications that Jimi's Prophecy holds for world history and religions. Those implications are explained in Rock Prophecy.

Because stories about asteroids were relentlessly reported during 1996 and 1997 and 1998, this book has been made to appear like an example of what The New York Times calls "bandwagoneers whose sudden interest in asteroids was excited by the smell of money." But the 1995 copyright date of my manuscript proves that the opposite is true: Rock Prophecy was NOT inspired by stories in the media, rather, the men who control media were inspired by my research. What the ruling class seeks is this: when the asteroid is finally discovered coming towards Earth, the men who control media can now say, "This is not a Hendrix Prophecy! Many people were predicting an asteroid disaster and reporting the threat, if Hendrix was on to this too, it's just a meaningless coincidence."

Keep in mind the following:

1) No one anywhere understood Jimi's Prophecy until I deciphered his writings and copyrighted the explanation on June 5, 1995.

2) More than four decades ago Hendrix envisioned an asteroid disaster. He was not just aware of the threat, he predicted in 1969 that "in about thirty years" we'll see what he means.

3) The escalation of asteroid stories that appeared in the media, starting in October 1995, five months after Rock Prophecy arrived at the Library of Congress, suggests that my writings are being monitored at the LOC.

4) A third of Rock Prophecy explains Jimi's prediction. The rest of the book explains how and why men have designed world religions to control women and maximize access to sex. Throughout history it's been these beliefs and customs that have brutalized half our race and stifled human advances that otherwise would have surfaced. Technology has been impeded. We are left defenseless against random impacts from space.

Our ruling class of dominators will arrange to confiscate all copies of Rock Prophecy. They aim to erase every trace of this book. As the asteroid approaches and civilization nears its end, dominators intend that during our final years the unjust monied, so-called "rich," will enjoy access to underserved privileges in unlimited amounts. Rock Prophecy reveals what Jimi tried to communicate: dominators have enslaved humanity and left us prone to a catastrophe that need not have been.

EstablishMENt think tanks have monitored the world's network of Hendrix researchers since before Jimi's death in September 1970. When the connections in Rock Prophecy start to circulate beyond dominator censorship, the men who control media will condemn this book and obstruct publicity about it. Resist by spreading word.

Anyone who can help, please contact First Century Press .

One final thought. Over a century ago, in 1898, German and French astronomers Gustav Witt and A. Chalois discovered one of the largest known near-Earth asteroids (21 miles wide) and named it "Eros." The word Eros is defined in the Random House Dictionary as the Greek word for Love. Eros is the "god of Love, son of Aphrodite, identified by the Romans with Cupid...a winged figure...representing the power of love...physical love and sexual desire."

Eros is the asteroid that inspired the name Jimi gave to another Rock that he saw hurtling towards Earth. Hendrix kept a statue of Cupid in his apartment. Part of the figure's wing was missing...